Key takeaways
- Medallia, Qualtrics, and InMoment are one category — enterprise XM suites with quote-only pricing; choosing among them only makes sense with a staffed CX function
- Below enterprise scale, pick by job: FeedSolve for resolving feedback and complaints, Zonka for omnichannel scores with lightweight cases, SurveySparrow/SurveyMonkey for measurement
- The closed loop is the part of Medallia an SMB actually needs — FeedSolve delivers it with QR intake, public tracking codes, and a resolution workflow from free
- A useful vendor test: can the person who reported a problem later see its status? Structural follow-up is what keeps feedback flowing
- Pairing a measurement tool with a resolution tool covers most of a Medallia 'programme' at two published price tags
Medallia's real competitors split by company size. At enterprise scale, Qualtrics and InMoment compete head-to-head with the same quote-only pricing. For everyone else, the practical Medallia alternatives are self-serve tools: FeedSolve for collecting and resolving feedback and complaints (free plan, then $19–79/month flat), Zonka Feedback for omnichannel surveys with case management (from $49/month), and SurveySparrow or SurveyMonkey for conversational and classic surveys. Choose by the job — resolution versus measurement — not by feature-list length.
What Medallia Is — and Who It's Actually For
Medallia is an enterprise experience-management platform: text/speech analytics, journey orchestration, feedback unified across dozens of sources.
Quote-only pricing, sales-led buying, and implementations measured in months, often with partners.
It assumes a staffed CX function — analysts who run programmes and act on dashboards.
Most 'Medallia alternative' searches come from companies that were never its market.
Medallia sits at the top of the customer-experience market alongside Qualtrics: a platform that ingests feedback from surveys, calls, chats, reviews, and apps, runs text and speech analytics across all of it, and orchestrates follow-up programmes for organisations with millions of customer interactions. Deployed inside a bank or an airline with a staffed CX team, it does things no small tool can. That is precisely the problem for everyone else — the product, the pricing, and the sales process all assume you are that bank.
There is no published price list, no self-serve signup, and no realistic path for a company without dedicated CX headcount to extract value from analyst-grade tooling. If you searched for alternatives because a case study impressed you but the demo call quoted a rollout project, the useful reframe is this: you don't need a smaller Medallia. You need to name the specific job — resolve complaints, measure satisfaction, or both at modest scale — and buy a tool built for that job at your size. The list below is organised exactly that way.
1. FeedSolve — Best for SMBs That Need Feedback Resolved, Not Analysed
Covers the operational core of a CX programme: collect, assign, track, resolve — without the analytics superstructure.
QR-code and link intake with no logins; anonymous submission; any language.
Public #FSV-XXXX tracking code per submission — the closed-loop follow-up Medallia calls 'inner loop', minus the enterprise machinery.
Published flat pricing: free plan, then $19–79/month. Live the same day, self-serve.
Strip a Medallia deployment down to the part that changes a small business's week and you get the closed loop: a customer or employee reports something, a person owns it, it gets fixed, and the reporter sees that it got fixed. FeedSolve is that loop as a standalone product. Intake happens through QR codes and links with zero logins — counter, break room, job site, invoice footer — every submission gets a public tracking code, and the team drives it to resolution on a Kanban board with an audit trail and a resolution-rate metric on top.
What FeedSolve deliberately omits is the layer that requires analysts: no speech analytics, no journey orchestration, no cross-source unification. For an SMB, that omission is the feature — it is why the product costs $19–79/month flat instead of a negotiated contract, and why it is running the same afternoon instead of next quarter. If your company has no one whose job title contains 'insights', you will use every part of FeedSolve and almost none of Medallia.
2. Qualtrics — The Head-to-Head Enterprise Competitor
Medallia's primary rival for enterprise XM programmes; strongest in research and survey science.
Same buying reality: quote-only pricing, sales-led process, serious implementation.
The right comparison for enterprises choosing between suites — not an escape from Medallia's model.
If pricing or rollout pushed you away from Medallia, Qualtrics won't fix that.
Any honest Medallia competitors list starts with Qualtrics, because that is who enterprise buyers actually shortlist against. Qualtrics comes from the research world — its survey design, statistical tooling, and academic pedigree are the differentiators — while Medallia's roots are operational CX. Large organisations choosing between them are making a real decision about programme philosophy, and both vendors will support a multi-month evaluation to help them make it.
But for readers below enterprise scale, Qualtrics is a category-mate, not an alternative: pricing is quote-only, entry is sales-gated, and the product presumes the same staffed CX function. If Medallia's procurement was the obstacle, moving your evaluation to Qualtrics relocates the obstacle. The genuine alternatives for smaller organisations are further down this list.
3. InMoment — The Other Enterprise CX Suite
Third of the big enterprise CX platforms: unified signals, AI analytics, managed programmes.
Known for strategic services alongside software — closer to a partnership than a purchase.
Quote-only, enterprise-focused; no self-serve tier.
Belongs on enterprise shortlists; out of reach (and out of scope) below that.
InMoment rounds out the enterprise tier. Its distinguishing trait is how much service comes wrapped around the software: strategic advisory, programme design, and managed analytics that make engagements feel closer to a consulting partnership than a SaaS subscription. For organisations that want expertise supplied alongside tooling, that model is a genuine differentiator against Medallia's platform-first approach.
The buying reality is the same as its peers — quote-only pricing and enterprise sales — so the same rule applies: InMoment is an alternative for companies choosing among enterprise suites, not for companies priced out of them. It appears here because comparison shoppers meet all three names together in analyst reports, and it is worth knowing which conversation you are actually in.
4. Zonka Feedback — Best Mid-Market Bridge
Omnichannel survey collection (kiosk, SMS, email, QR) with NPS/CSAT dashboards, from $49/month.
Includes case management — a lightweight version of Medallia's closed-loop workflow.
Self-serve with published pricing; realistic for multi-location SMBs and mid-market teams.
Case tracking stays internal — submitters never see a status, unlike a public tracking code.
Zonka Feedback is the closest thing on this list to a scaled-down Medallia: it collects across channels, reports experience metrics properly, and includes case management so poor scores trigger trackable follow-up. For a multi-location retailer or clinic group that wants NPS dashboards and some closed-loop discipline at published prices, it is a legitimate bridge between survey tools and the enterprise suites, starting around $49/month.
Its closed loop has a one-way window: cases exist for your team, but the customer who triggered one has no reference number and no way to check what happened. Whether that gap matters depends on your feedback mix — for score-driven programmes it is tolerable; for complaint-heavy operations, submitter-visible tracking is usually the difference between a loop that closes and one that quietly doesn't.
5. SurveySparrow — Best for Conversational Measurement
Chat-style surveys with strong NPS/CSAT tooling and recurring pulse scheduling.
Published mid-market pricing, self-serve signup.
Covers the measurement slice of a Medallia programme at a fraction of the cost.
No meaningful resolution workflow — pair with an operational tool if you need one.
If what drew you to Medallia was ongoing experience measurement — recurring NPS pulses, CSAT tracking, employee-experience surveys — SurveySparrow delivers that slice self-serve. Its conversational, one-question-at-a-time format measurably helps completion rates, and its scheduling handles the recurring-programme mechanics that spreadsheet-and-form setups fumble.
It is a measurement tool, full stop: what happens to an individual unhappy response remains your team's manual problem. Mid-market teams sometimes pair it with an operational tool — SurveySparrow for the quarterly pulse, FeedSolve for the always-on complaint and suggestion loop — which together cover most of what a Medallia 'programme' would, at two published price tags.
6. SurveyMonkey — Best Familiar Default for Basic Programmes
The most widely known survey platform; templates and distribution make setup trivial.
Free tier exists; paid team plans are per-user.
Right for periodic satisfaction surveys and quick research.
No closed loop of any kind — responses are data, not tasks.
SurveyMonkey is the pragmatic floor for this list: if your entire experience programme is a periodic satisfaction survey and the occasional questionnaire, it does the job with zero learning curve and a familiar name that makes internal signoff easy. Its template library covers NPS, CSAT, and event feedback, and results arrive in serviceable dashboards.
Everything said about survey-first tools applies at full strength — a complaint that lands in a SurveyMonkey response set has no owner, no status, and no future. As a Medallia alternative it covers the narrowest slice, but for many small organisations that slice, plus a real resolution tool for issues, is the entire requirement.
Choosing by Company Size and Job
Enterprise with staffed CX function → shortlist Medallia vs Qualtrics vs InMoment; expect quotes and rollouts.
Mid-market, score-driven, multi-location → Zonka Feedback; add SurveySparrow for pulse programmes.
SMB whose feedback is mostly issues to fix → FeedSolve; measurement can come later.
The test: does the submitter of a complaint ever see its status? If that matters, buy for it.
Segment first by size, then by job. If you have CX analysts on staff and enterprise budget, the suite comparison is real — run it properly between Medallia, Qualtrics, and InMoment. If you are mid-market and score-driven, Zonka gives you the dashboards plus lightweight cases, and SurveySparrow strengthens the measurement side. If you are an SMB whose 'CX programme' is really a stream of complaints, suggestions, and the occasional compliment, resolution is the whole job — and FeedSolve is built for exactly that, at prices that don't require a business case.
One question cuts through most vendor noise: when a customer or employee reports a problem, can they later see what happened to it? Enterprise suites achieve this with orchestrated 'inner loop' workflows; FeedSolve achieves it with a public tracking code; most survey tools don't achieve it at all. Answering feedback is what makes people keep giving it — buy whichever tool makes that answer structural at your scale.
FAQs
Who are Medallia's main competitors?
At enterprise scale: Qualtrics and InMoment — both quote-priced suites competing for the same programmes. Below enterprise scale, the practical competitors are self-serve tools that cover slices of the job: FeedSolve (feedback resolution), Zonka Feedback (omnichannel surveys with cases), SurveySparrow and SurveyMonkey (measurement).
What is the best Medallia alternative for a small business?
FeedSolve, if your feedback consists of complaints, suggestions, and issues that need resolving — it delivers the closed loop (QR intake, assignment, public tracking codes, resolution metrics) from free, with paid plans $19–79/month flat. If you mainly need satisfaction scores, Zonka Feedback or SurveySparrow fit better.
How much does Medallia cost?
Medallia doesn't publish pricing. Contracts are negotiated, typically annual, and enterprise deployments commonly reach five or six figures once implementation is included. There is no self-serve tier — which is usually the moment small and mid-size buyers start searching for alternatives.
Is Qualtrics cheaper than Medallia?
There's no meaningful public answer: both are quote-only and price by scope. For budgeting, treat them as the same category. If the category's pricing model is the problem, the fix is a self-serve tool with published pricing, not the rival suite.
Can FeedSolve really replace Medallia's closed-loop feedback?
It replaces the closed loop itself — report, assign, resolve, show the reporter the outcome — which FeedSolve implements with public tracking codes and a Kanban workflow. It does not replace Medallia's analytics: no text mining, no journey orchestration. For organisations without analysts, that trade removes almost nothing they would have used and saves the enterprise contract.
Ready to fix your feedback loop?
Set up your first complaint board in under 2 minutes. No credit card required.
Try FeedSolve Free